The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with vulvar lichen planus who have failed topical therapy with potent corticosteroids: a study protocol for a single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar lichen planus (VLP) is a chronic vulvar dermatosis that is difficult to treat and can severely impair quality of life in the absence of adequate treatment. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to direct therapy for VLP. This randomised controlled trial will be the first double-blinded study comparing systemic treatments in VLP and aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib compared to methotrexate, in patients with VLP who have failed treatment with potent topical corticosteroids. METHODS: A total of 116 women aged ≥ 18 years with moderate to severe VLP (Genital Erosive Lichen Planus (GELP) score ≥ 5) will be recruited. All participants will initially be treated with Diprosone® OV daily, and their outcome will be assessed using the GELP score. At 8 weeks' follow-up, responders (GELP < 5) will be continued on Diprosone® OV. Non-responders (GELP ≥ 5) will be randomised 1:1 in a blinded fashion to receive (i) methotrexate 10 mg weekly + placebo tablet twice daily + folic acid 5 mg weekly or (ii) deucravacitinib 6 mg twice daily + placebo tablet weekly + folic acid 5 mg weekly. The primary endpoint is the difference in the mean change of GELP scores from baseline to week 32 between deucravacitinib and methotrexate groups. DISCUSSION: High-quality evidence guiding the management of women with VLP is lacking. Once completed, this will be the first double-blinded RCT to compare systemic treatments in VLP. The results of this study will provide valuable, high-quality data to guide second-line therapy options for VLP that is recalcitrant to potent topical corticosteroids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000682640. Registered on 26 June 2023.

Photodynamic therapy for refractory erosive oral lichen planus: a case series study.

Oral lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs on the oral mucosa and is an oral potentially malignant disease. Treatment of oral lichen planus aims to promote healing of the erosion, relieve pain, reduce recurrence of the erosion, and prevent canceration. Corticosteroids are the first line of treatment for oral lichen planus. Refractory oral lichen planus is a clinical classification of oral lichen planus that has not responded to corticosteroid treatment for more than 2 months. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy is an innovative and effective treatment for potentially malignant oral diseases and has been reported as an alternative treatment to conventional therapies for oral lichen planus. On this basis, we report 3 cases of refractory erosive oral lichen planus in which persistent erosive lesions healed after topical application of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy without any adverse effects or any signs of recurrence. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy will become an effective clinical treatment for refractory erosive oral lichen planus.

Lichen planus pemphigoides induced by anti-PD-1 antibody: A case only involved in oral mucosa with excellent topical treatment efficiency.

Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) is a rare autoimmune subepidermal disease that can occur in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Its clinical manifestations are combined with the characteristics of lichen planus with bullous pemphigoid that can occur on either skin or oral mucosa. It should be noted that oral LPP is very rare. Here, we report a novel case of oral LPP induced by an anti-PD-1 agent. The patient presented with typical clinical features in oral mucosa, and the diagnosis was based on histopathology and immunological studies. Given that the patient was receiving an anti-PD-1 agent, topical therapy was chosen, and a nice therapeutic effect was obtained. No significant recurrence was observed after a 2-year follow-up. A good and stable therapeutic effect achieved by rapid and local symptomatic medication suggests that accurate and sensitive diagnosis is necessary.

Pembrolizumab-induced lichen planus in patients with metastatic melanoma: a report of two cases and prognostic implications of cutaneous immune-related adverse events.

Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) commonly experience cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We present two cases, a 51-year-old female and a 70-year-old male, that were undergoing treatment with pembrolizumab for metastatic melanoma and developed scaly, erythematous papules on their skin. Following skin biopsies, histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of lichen planus. In the first patient, acitretin at a dosage of 25 mg/day was administered for 6 months, resulting in complete resolution of lichen lesions. Imaging scans showed no signs of melanoma. The second patient was treated with topical betamethasone dipropionate ointment for several weeks, which led to a favorable therapeutic response. During follow-up, a thoracic CT scan showed several micronodular lesions in the right lung, whereas brain and abdomen CT scans showed no signs of the disease. Lichen planus is not a commonly reported irAE in patients treated with ICIs. This report underscores the importance of conducting skin biopsies in patients receiving ICI therapy and highlights the potential prognostic importance of skin irAEs in patients with melanoma receiving such treatment.

ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS: LICHEN PLANUS OF THE PENIS AFTER INTAKE OF NEBIVOLOL- FIRST REPORTED CASE IN THE WORLD LITERATURE.

The pathogenesis of lichen planus and lichenoid-type reactions remains shrouded in mystery to this day, precisely because of the inability to perform acute/specific tests for reproduction of a particular type of reaction (in this case lichenoid) in order to prove a causal relationship. Nevertheless, the concept of molecular mimicry/antigen mimicry as a possible important pathogenetic inducer for lichen planus and lichenoid-type reactions, is increasingly becoming a topic of discussion and remains more than relevant at present. Disturbances in the integrity of tissue homeostasis- in one form or another, in fact, become a powerful generator of cross-mediated immunity, possibly directed at tissue-localized structures/structural elements/proteins or amino acids. The observation and reporting of this kind of disorders (even in the absence of the mentioned tests), as well as their parallel manifestation with a disease such as lichen planus (or lichenoid-type reaction), has led over the years to the validation of the now universal belief that the disease is multifactorially determined. And the causes of disruption of this integrity can be both external- infectious, meicamentous as well as internal- tumoral, paraneoplastic, etc. Medication induction or triggering of lichen planus by beta blockers has been observed and reported frequently over the years, and the clinical picture can vary and be extremely heterogeneous. We describe the first case in the world literature of a lichen planus after nebivolol administration that developed in the strictly restricted area of the glans penis. According to a reference in the medical literature, this is also the second case in the world literature of penile localized lichen planus after beta blocker intake. The other analogous one was recorded and described back in 1991 after propranolol intake.

Lichenoid drug eruption associated with imatinib mesylate therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Imatinib Mesylate (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been reported to cause several adverse reactions, most of them with cutaneous involvement. Non- Lichenoid IM associated skin reactions have been sufficiently- recorded. To our knowledge, Lichenoid Drug Eruption (LDE) is recorded in a minority of registries. CASE REPORT: To describe an LDE induced case by IM treatment. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Histological Confirmation and promptly dermatological consultation relieved successfully the cutaneous adverse event. DISCUSSION: Ongoing expansion of IM usage in a wide spectrum of new indications is more likely to make physicians experience such LDE cutaneous side effects more often. Hence, they should be highly suspicious to early detect these distinct histologic entities, handle these undesired complications and guarantee satisfactory immediate outcomes, avoiding frivolous IM dosage modifications.

A case of severe nivolumab-induced lichen planus pemphigoides in a child with metastatic spitzoid melanoma.

Dermatologic reactions are among the most common adverse events of antiprogrammed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibodies agents and include maculopapular rash, psoriasiform rash, lichenoid eruptions, autoimmune bullous disorders, and vitiligo. Here, we present a case of a 12-year-old African American male with metastatic spitzoid melanoma treated with nivolumab who developed a mild lichenoid eruption that progressed to a severe case of lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP). Management was complex given the patient's age and history and included hospitalization for intravenous steroids, an intensive topical steroid regimen, methotrexate, and discontinuation of nivolumab. This case illustrates a rare but dramatic progression from a mild LP-like eruption to severe bullous lichenoid eruption, most consistent with LPP, as well as the diagnostic and treatment challenges in the setting of a pediatric patient on nivolumab.

Dermatopathology of COVID-19 infection and vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Many peculiar skin changes have been described in relation to both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination. OBJECTIVE: This paper provides an overview of these dermatologic manifestations, focusing on their dermatopathological appearances. RESULTS: Most COVID-19 patients develop variegated maculopapular eruptions with a combination of histological patterns commonly including keratinocyte apoptosis and eosinophilia. Urticaria-like lesions often show a combination of spongiotic and lichenoid patterns and are more frequent in individuals with severe disease. Vesicular lesions can be disseminated; in some cases, they become pustular and in others show dyskeratosis and a peculiar form of ballooning. Some patients develop vesicular Grover disease on the trunk. Young patients with a strong immunological response can eliminate the virus easily but may develop chilblains as a consequence of the high interferon response. Conversely, older individuals with immunosenescence and a tendency toward hypercoagulability can present livedoid and ischemic areas. Regarding COVID-19 vaccination, hypersensitivity reactions are most frequent, including "COVID-arm." Nonetheless, a combination of local and systemic cutaneous manifestations (reactogenicity) is commonly seen. Histopathologically, lichenoid and spongiotic changes and a variable number of eosinophils are typical of rashes characterized by papules and plaques. Other dermatological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination include lesions mimicking well-defined dermatoses such as lichen planus or bullous pemphigoid and triggering of collagenous diseases. CONCLUSION: Well-characterized skin manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chilblains, livedo necrotic lesions, vesicular eruptions, urticarial lesions, and maculopapular eruptions. Hypersensitivity reactions are common after SARS-CoV­2 mRNA vaccination. Vaccine reactions may also mimic other dermatosis such as bullous pemphigoid or lichen planus, stimulate herpes reactivation, or trigger the development of autoimmune diseases.

Efficacy and safety of oral pioglitazone in the management of lichen planopilaris in comparison with clobetasol: A randomized clinical trial.

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a scarring alopecia for which no treatment with remarkable effect has been identified. Pioglitazone has been reported as a possible therapeutic option. To compare the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone with clobetasol in LPP. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group was conducted at Razi hospital. Patients were treated either with pioglitazone 15 mg/daily or clobetasol lotion 0.05% once at night for 6 months. Patients were visited every 2 months to assess the lichen planopilaris activity index (LPPAI) and record probable adverse events. Forty patients (mean age: 43.6 years; 62.5% female) were randomized 1:1. The mean of LPPAI at baseline and last session were 4.68 ± 1.97 and 2.59 ± 0.97 in the clobetasol group and 5.01 ± 1.71 and 3.04 ± 1.36 in the pioglitazone group, respectively. Both treatments significantly decreased the LPPAI over the two-month interval visits (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the LPPAI reduction was detected between groups. Regarding the safety profile, three clobetasol-treated patients developed folliculitis, and two in the pioglitazone group developed mild headaches. Pioglitazone effectively controlled the signs and symptoms of the LPP with no serious side effects. It can be considered a treatment option for LPP, although it was not superior to clobetasol.